Metabolism of Cities
  • About

    About Us

    • Our Story
    • Mission & Values
    • Team
    • Task Forces
    • Services

    Connect With Us

    • ContributeJoin Us
    • Subscribe
    • Contact Us
  • Community

    Research

    • Projects
    • Theses
    • ContributeAdd Research
    • People

    Updates

    • Events
    • News
  • Resources

    Getting Started

    • About Urban Metabolism
    • Starter Kit

    Multimedia

    • Photos
    • Videos

    Publications

    • Library
    • Journals
    • ContributeAdd Publication

    Data

    • Datasets
    • Data Visualisations

    Tools

    • Online Material Flow Analysis Tool (OMAT)
    • MOOC
  • Cities

    MultipliCity - Data Portals

    • Introduction
    • Video
    • Add DataContribute
    • Data Collection Events
    • Development Roadmap
    • Datasets

    Existing Data Portals

    • Prototype: Cape Town, South Africa
    • Prototype: The Hague, Netherlands
    • Prototype: Beijing, China
    • Overview page

    Upcoming Data Portals

    • Apeldoorn, Netherlands Coming soon
    • Bødo, Norway Coming soon
    • Brussels, Belgium Coming soon
    • Høje Taastrup, Denmark Coming soon
    • Mikkeli, Finland Coming soon
    • Porto, Portugal Coming soon
    • Sevilla, Spain Coming soon
    • Toronto, Canada Coming soon
    • Your city?
    • Orange Theme
    • Blue Theme
    • Metabolism of Cities
    • Metabolism of Islands

Publications

  1. Resources
  2. Publications
  3. Publication #698

Bibtex

@article{reference_tag,
  author = "Emiliano J. Cahe  and , Jorge D. De Prada",
  title = "Multi-criteria analysis and interactive selection of urban solid waste management proposals, Santa Eufemia, Córdoba, Argentina",
  journal = "Revista Argentina de Economía Agraria (Argentine Agricultural Economics Review)",
  year = 2016,url = "http://www.aaea.com.ar/_upload/files/publicaciones/16_20161228121740_Trabajo_17.pdf",
  abstract = "The objective of this article is to show an interactive multi-criteria method for evaluating proposals for   management   of   urban   solid   waste   in   Santa   Eufemia,   Córdoba,  Argentina.   Five   alternatives:PGRSU1_tendential;   PGRSU2_SinHo;   PGRSU3_Ecomanagement;   PGRSU4_Ecomanagementwith mixed destinations; PGRSU_5 were designed and evaluated seven criteria: Investments ($);Municipal Economic Cost ($/year); GHG emissions (tons CO2 eq yr-1); Qualitative: Fragmentation of Landscape and Visual; Affections risk to the Population Health; Social involvement; Institutional Political effort. The PROMETHEE method was used to choose the proposal, and preferences were surveyed   in   workshops   with   government   and   local   actors.   The   results   show   conflicts   between proposals. PGRSU_1 is the best alternative investment and the worst is PGRSU_5 ($ 2,135,000versus   $   5,585,000).   PGRSU_3   has   the   lowest   economic   cost   city   ($   2,687,699).   Institutional political   effort   is   PGRSU_1   the   best   and   worst   is   PGRSU_3;   reverse  situation  for   the  criterion social   involvement.   As   for   GHG   emissions   is   the   best   alternative   PGRSU_3   and   worse   the PGRSU_4 (2,792 versus 6,329 tons CO2 eq yr-1). Decision makers consider important the seven criteria, giving higher preference to social involvement and criterion (μ = 9.4 and = 0.88) lower at the   municipal   economic   cost   (μ   =   6.3   and   =   3.00).   The   selected   alternative   is PGRSU3_Ecomanagement.",
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
T1 - Multi-criteria analysis and interactive selection of urban solid waste management proposals, Santa Eufemia, Córdoba, Argentina
AU - Emiliano J. Cahe  and , Jorge D. De Prada
Y1 - 2016
UR - http://www.aaea.com.ar/_upload/files/publicaciones/16_20161228121740_Trabajo_17.pdf
N2 - The objective of this article is to show an interactive multi-criteria method for evaluating proposals for   management   of   urban   solid   waste   in   Santa   Eufemia,   Córdoba,  Argentina.   Five   alternatives:PGRSU1_tendential;   PGRSU2_SinHo;   PGRSU3_Ecomanagement;   PGRSU4_Ecomanagementwith mixed destinations; PGRSU_5 were designed and evaluated seven criteria: Investments ($);Municipal Economic Cost ($/year); GHG emissions (tons CO2 eq yr-1); Qualitative: Fragmentation of Landscape and Visual; Affections risk to the Population Health; Social involvement; Institutional Political effort. The PROMETHEE method was used to choose the proposal, and preferences were surveyed   in   workshops   with   government   and   local   actors.   The   results   show   conflicts   between proposals. PGRSU_1 is the best alternative investment and the worst is PGRSU_5 ($ 2,135,000versus   $   5,585,000).   PGRSU_3   has   the   lowest   economic   cost   city   ($   2,687,699).   Institutional political   effort   is   PGRSU_1   the   best   and   worst   is   PGRSU_3;   reverse  situation  for   the  criterion social   involvement.   As   for   GHG   emissions   is   the   best   alternative   PGRSU_3   and   worse   the PGRSU_4 (2,792 versus 6,329 tons CO2 eq yr-1). Decision makers consider important the seven criteria, giving higher preference to social involvement and criterion (μ = 9.4 and = 0.88) lower at the   municipal   economic   cost   (μ   =   6.3   and   =   3.00).   The   selected   alternative   is PGRSU3_Ecomanagement.
ER - 

Journal Article

2016

Author(s)

  • Emiliano J. Cahe
  • Jorge D. De Prada

Reference

  • Bibtex
  • RIS
  • RefWorks

Search

  • Google Scholar
  • Google

More options

Add a publication

Report error

Multi-criteria analysis and interactive selection of urban solid waste management proposals, Santa Eufemia, Córdoba, Argentina

Revista Argentina de Economía Agraria (Argentine Agricultural Economics Review)

Revista Argentina de Economía Agraria (Argentine Agricultural Economics Review)

The objective of this article is to show an interactive multi-criteria method for evaluating proposals for management of urban solid waste in Santa Eufemia, Córdoba, Argentina. Five alternatives:PGRSU1_tendential; PGRSU2_SinHo; PGRSU3_Ecomanagement; PGRSU4_Ecomanagementwith mixed destinations; PGRSU_5 were designed and evaluated seven criteria: Investments ($);Municipal Economic Cost ($/year); GHG emissions (tons CO2 eq yr-1); Qualitative: Fragmentation of Landscape and Visual; Affections risk to the Population Health; Social involvement; Institutional Political effort. The PROMETHEE method was used to choose the proposal, and preferences were surveyed in workshops with government and local actors. The results show conflicts between proposals. PGRSU_1 is the best alternative investment and the worst is PGRSU_5 ($ 2,135,000versus $ 5,585,000). PGRSU_3 has the lowest economic cost city ($ 2,687,699). Institutional political effort is PGRSU_1 the best and worst is PGRSU_3; reverse situation for the criterion social involvement. As for GHG emissions is the best alternative PGRSU_3 and worse the PGRSU_4 (2,792 versus 6,329 tons CO2 eq yr-1). Decision makers consider important the seven criteria, giving higher preference to social involvement and criterion (μ = 9.4 and = 0.88) lower at the municipal economic cost (μ = 6.3 and = 3.00). The selected alternative is PGRSU3_Ecomanagement.

Tags

  • Urban

More information

Website

  • Literature
  • Publications
  • Journals
  • Events
  • Publishers

Latest news

Reflections on the first Actionable Science for Urban Sustainability (un)conference (AScUS) 2020
June 23, 2020

Read more

Do you have data on resource flows?

Share data

We can use your help

Join us

Metabolism of Cities

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Our source code is available on
Gitlab

Contact us

Follow Us

Metabolism of Islands

Visit our twin site:
Metabolism of Islands