Publications

@article{reference_tag,
  author = "Emiliano J. Cahe  and , Jorge D. De Prada",
  title = "Multi-criteria analysis and interactive selection of urban solid waste management proposals, Santa Eufemia, Córdoba, Argentina",
  journal = "Revista Argentina de Economía Agraria (Argentine Agricultural Economics Review)",
  year = 2016,url = "http://www.aaea.com.ar/_upload/files/publicaciones/16_20161228121740_Trabajo_17.pdf",
  abstract = "The objective of this article is to show an interactive multi-criteria method for evaluating proposals for   management   of   urban   solid   waste   in   Santa   Eufemia,   Córdoba,  Argentina.   Five   alternatives:PGRSU1_tendential;   PGRSU2_SinHo;   PGRSU3_Ecomanagement;   PGRSU4_Ecomanagementwith mixed destinations; PGRSU_5 were designed and evaluated seven criteria: Investments ($);Municipal Economic Cost ($/year); GHG emissions (tons CO2 eq yr-1); Qualitative: Fragmentation of Landscape and Visual; Affections risk to the Population Health; Social involvement; Institutional Political effort. The PROMETHEE method was used to choose the proposal, and preferences were surveyed   in   workshops   with   government   and   local   actors.   The   results   show   conflicts   between proposals. PGRSU_1 is the best alternative investment and the worst is PGRSU_5 ($ 2,135,000versus   $   5,585,000).   PGRSU_3   has   the   lowest   economic   cost   city   ($   2,687,699).   Institutional political   effort   is   PGRSU_1   the   best   and   worst   is   PGRSU_3;   reverse  situation  for   the  criterion social   involvement.   As   for   GHG   emissions   is   the   best   alternative   PGRSU_3   and   worse   the PGRSU_4 (2,792 versus 6,329 tons CO2 eq yr-1). Decision makers consider important the seven criteria, giving higher preference to social involvement and criterion (μ = 9.4 and = 0.88) lower at the   municipal   economic   cost   (μ   =   6.3   and   =   3.00).   The   selected   alternative   is PGRSU3_Ecomanagement.",
}

TY  - JOUR
T1 - Multi-criteria analysis and interactive selection of urban solid waste management proposals, Santa Eufemia, Córdoba, Argentina
AU - Emiliano J. Cahe  and , Jorge D. De Prada
Y1 - 2016
UR - http://www.aaea.com.ar/_upload/files/publicaciones/16_20161228121740_Trabajo_17.pdf
N2 - The objective of this article is to show an interactive multi-criteria method for evaluating proposals for   management   of   urban   solid   waste   in   Santa   Eufemia,   Córdoba,  Argentina.   Five   alternatives:PGRSU1_tendential;   PGRSU2_SinHo;   PGRSU3_Ecomanagement;   PGRSU4_Ecomanagementwith mixed destinations; PGRSU_5 were designed and evaluated seven criteria: Investments ($);Municipal Economic Cost ($/year); GHG emissions (tons CO2 eq yr-1); Qualitative: Fragmentation of Landscape and Visual; Affections risk to the Population Health; Social involvement; Institutional Political effort. The PROMETHEE method was used to choose the proposal, and preferences were surveyed   in   workshops   with   government   and   local   actors.   The   results   show   conflicts   between proposals. PGRSU_1 is the best alternative investment and the worst is PGRSU_5 ($ 2,135,000versus   $   5,585,000).   PGRSU_3   has   the   lowest   economic   cost   city   ($   2,687,699).   Institutional political   effort   is   PGRSU_1   the   best   and   worst   is   PGRSU_3;   reverse  situation  for   the  criterion social   involvement.   As   for   GHG   emissions   is   the   best   alternative   PGRSU_3   and   worse   the PGRSU_4 (2,792 versus 6,329 tons CO2 eq yr-1). Decision makers consider important the seven criteria, giving higher preference to social involvement and criterion (μ = 9.4 and = 0.88) lower at the   municipal   economic   cost   (μ   =   6.3   and   =   3.00).   The   selected   alternative   is PGRSU3_Ecomanagement.
ER -